mirror of https://github.com/abpframework/abp
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
448 lines
16 KiB
448 lines
16 KiB
# Entity Framework Core Integration
|
|
|
|
This document explains how to integrate EF Core as an ORM provider to ABP based applications and how to configure it.
|
|
|
|
## Installation
|
|
|
|
`Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore` is the main nuget package for the EF Core integration. Install it to your project (for a layered application, to your data/infrastructure layer):
|
|
|
|
```` shell
|
|
Install-Package Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
Then add `AbpEntityFrameworkCoreModule` module dependency (`DependsOn` attribute) to your [module](Module-Development-Basics.md):
|
|
|
|
````c#
|
|
using Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore;
|
|
using Volo.Abp.Modularity;
|
|
|
|
namespace MyCompany.MyProject
|
|
{
|
|
[DependsOn(typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCoreModule))]
|
|
public class MyModule : AbpModule
|
|
{
|
|
//...
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
> Note: Instead, you can directly download a [startup template](https://abp.io/Templates) with EF Core pre-installed.
|
|
|
|
### Database Management System Selection
|
|
|
|
Entity Framework Core supports various database management systems ([see all](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/providers/)). ABP framework and this document doesn't depend on any specific DBMS.
|
|
|
|
If you are creating a [reusable application module](Modules/Index.md), avoid to depend on a specific DBMS package. However, in a final application you eventually will select a DBMS.
|
|
|
|
See [Switch to Another DBMS for Entity Framework Core](Entity-Framework-Core-Other-DBMS.md) document to learn how to switch the DBMS.
|
|
|
|
## Creating DbContext
|
|
|
|
You can create your DbContext as you normally do. It should be derived from `AbpDbContext<T>` as shown below:
|
|
|
|
````C#
|
|
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
|
|
using Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore;
|
|
|
|
namespace MyCompany.MyProject
|
|
{
|
|
public class MyDbContext : AbpDbContext<MyDbContext>
|
|
{
|
|
//...your DbSet properties here
|
|
|
|
public MyDbContext(DbContextOptions<MyDbContext> options)
|
|
: base(options)
|
|
{
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
### About the EF Core Fluent Mapping
|
|
|
|
The [application startup template](Startup-Templates/Application.md) has been configured to use the [EF Core fluent configuration API](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/modeling/) to map your entities to your database tables.
|
|
|
|
You can still use the **data annotation attributes** (like `[Required]`) on the properties of your entity while the ABP documentation generally follows the **fluent mapping API** approach. It is up to you.
|
|
|
|
ABP Framework has some **base entity classes** and **conventions** (see the [entities document](Entities.md)) and it provides some useful **extension methods** to configure the properties inherited from the base entity classes.
|
|
|
|
#### ConfigureByConvention Method
|
|
|
|
`ConfigureByConvention()` is the main extension method that **configures all the base properties** and conventions for your entities. So, it is a **best practice** to call this method for all your entities, in your fluent mapping code.
|
|
|
|
**Example**: Assume that you've a `Book` entity derived from `AggregateRoot<Guid>` base class:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
public class Book : AuditedAggregateRoot<Guid>
|
|
{
|
|
public string Name { get; set; }
|
|
}
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
You can override the `OnModelCreating` method in your `DbContext` and configure the mapping as shown below:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
|
|
{
|
|
//Always call the base method
|
|
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
|
|
|
|
builder.Entity<Book>(b =>
|
|
{
|
|
b.ToTable("Books");
|
|
|
|
//Configure the base properties
|
|
b.ConfigureByConvention();
|
|
|
|
//Configure other properties (if you are using the fluent API)
|
|
b.Property(x => x.Name).IsRequired().HasMaxLength(128);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
* Calling `b.ConfigureByConvention()` is important here to properly **configure the base properties**.
|
|
* You can configure the `Name` property here or you can use the **data annotation attributes** (see the [EF Core document](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/modeling/entity-properties)).
|
|
|
|
> While there are many extension methods to configure your base properties, `ConfigureByConvention()` internally calls them if necessary. So, it is enough to call it.
|
|
|
|
### Configure the Connection String Selection
|
|
|
|
If you have multiple databases in your application, you can configure the connection string name for your DbContext using the `[ConnectionStringName]` attribute. Example:
|
|
|
|
```csharp
|
|
[ConnectionStringName("MySecondConnString")]
|
|
public class MyDbContext : AbpDbContext<MyDbContext>
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If you don't configure, the `Default` connection string is used. If you configure a specific connection string name, but not define this connection string name in the application configuration then it fallbacks to the `Default` connection string (see [the connection strings document](Connection-Strings.md) for more information).
|
|
|
|
## Registering DbContext To Dependency Injection
|
|
|
|
Use `AddAbpDbContext` method in your module to register your DbContext class for [dependency injection](Dependency-Injection.md) system.
|
|
|
|
````C#
|
|
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
|
|
using Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore;
|
|
using Volo.Abp.Modularity;
|
|
|
|
namespace MyCompany.MyProject
|
|
{
|
|
[DependsOn(typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCoreModule))]
|
|
public class MyModule : AbpModule
|
|
{
|
|
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
|
|
{
|
|
context.Services.AddAbpDbContext<MyDbContext>();
|
|
|
|
//...
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
### Add Default Repositories
|
|
|
|
ABP can automatically create default [generic repositories](Repositories.md) for the entities in your DbContext. Just use `AddDefaultRepositories()` option on the registration:
|
|
|
|
````C#
|
|
services.AddAbpDbContext<MyDbContext>(options =>
|
|
{
|
|
options.AddDefaultRepositories();
|
|
});
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
This will create a repository for each [aggregate root entity](Entities.md) (classes derived from `AggregateRoot`) by default. If you want to create repositories for other entities too, then set `includeAllEntities` to `true`:
|
|
|
|
````C#
|
|
services.AddAbpDbContext<MyDbContext>(options =>
|
|
{
|
|
options.AddDefaultRepositories(includeAllEntities: true);
|
|
});
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
Then you can inject and use `IRepository<TEntity, TPrimaryKey>` in your services. Assume that you have a `Book` entity with `Guid` primary key:
|
|
|
|
```csharp
|
|
public class Book : AggregateRoot<Guid>
|
|
{
|
|
public string Name { get; set; }
|
|
|
|
public BookType Type { get; set; }
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
(`BookType` is a simple enum here) And you want to create a new `Book` entity in a [domain service](Domain-Services.md):
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
public class BookManager : DomainService
|
|
{
|
|
private readonly IRepository<Book, Guid> _bookRepository;
|
|
|
|
//inject default repository to the constructor
|
|
public BookManager(IRepository<Book, Guid> bookRepository)
|
|
{
|
|
_bookRepository = bookRepository;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public async Task<Book> CreateBook(string name, BookType type)
|
|
{
|
|
Check.NotNullOrWhiteSpace(name, nameof(name));
|
|
|
|
var book = new Book
|
|
{
|
|
Id = GuidGenerator.Create(),
|
|
Name = name,
|
|
Type = type
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
//Use a standard repository method
|
|
await _bookRepository.InsertAsync(book);
|
|
|
|
return book;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
This sample uses `InsertAsync` method to insert a new entity to the database.
|
|
|
|
### Add Custom Repositories
|
|
|
|
Default generic repositories are powerful enough in most cases (since they implement `IQueryable`). However, you may need to create a custom repository to add your own repository methods. Assume that you want to delete all books by type.
|
|
|
|
It's suggested to define an interface for your custom repository:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
public interface IBookRepository : IRepository<Book, Guid>
|
|
{
|
|
Task DeleteBooksByType(BookType type);
|
|
}
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
You generally want to derive from the `IRepository` to inherit standard repository methods. However, you don't have to. Repository interfaces are defined in the domain layer of a layered application. They are implemented in the data/infrastructure layer (`EntityFrameworkCore` project in a [startup template](https://abp.io/Templates)).
|
|
|
|
Example implementation of the `IBookRepository` interface:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
public class BookRepository : EfCoreRepository<BookStoreDbContext, Book, Guid>, IBookRepository
|
|
{
|
|
public BookRepository(IDbContextProvider<BookStoreDbContext> dbContextProvider)
|
|
: base(dbContextProvider)
|
|
{
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public async Task DeleteBooksByType(BookType type)
|
|
{
|
|
await DbContext.Database.ExecuteSqlRawAsync(
|
|
$"DELETE FROM Books WHERE Type = {(int)type}"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
Now, it's possible to [inject](Dependency-Injection.md) the `IBookRepository` and use the `DeleteBooksByType` method when needed.
|
|
|
|
#### Override the Default Generic Repository
|
|
|
|
Even if you create a custom repository, you can still inject the default generic repository (`IRepository<Book, Guid>` for this example). Default repository implementation will not use the class you have created.
|
|
|
|
If you want to replace default repository implementation with your custom repository, do it inside the `AddAbpDbContext` options:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
context.Services.AddAbpDbContext<BookStoreDbContext>(options =>
|
|
{
|
|
options.AddDefaultRepositories();
|
|
|
|
//Replaces IRepository<Book, Guid>
|
|
options.AddRepository<Book, BookRepository>();
|
|
});
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
This is especially important when you want to **override a base repository method** to customize it. For instance, you may want to override `DeleteAsync` method to delete a specific entity in a more efficient way:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
public override async Task DeleteAsync(
|
|
Guid id,
|
|
bool autoSave = false,
|
|
CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
|
|
{
|
|
//TODO: Custom implementation of the delete method
|
|
}
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
## Access to the EF Core API
|
|
|
|
In most cases, you want to hide EF Core APIs behind a repository (this is the main purpose of the repository pattern). However, if you want to access the `DbContext` instance over the repository, you can use `GetDbContext()` or `GetDbSet()` extension methods. Example:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
public class BookService
|
|
{
|
|
private readonly IRepository<Book, Guid> _bookRepository;
|
|
|
|
public BookService(IRepository<Book, Guid> bookRepository)
|
|
{
|
|
_bookRepository = bookRepository;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public void Foo()
|
|
{
|
|
DbContext dbContext = _bookRepository.GetDbContext();
|
|
DbSet<Book> books = _bookRepository.GetDbSet();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
* `GetDbContext` returns a `DbContext` reference instead of `BookStoreDbContext`. You can cast it, however in most cases you don't need it.
|
|
|
|
> Important: You must reference to the `Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore` package from the project you want to access to the DbContext. This breaks encapsulation, but this is what you want in that case.
|
|
|
|
## Extra Properties & Object Extension Manager
|
|
|
|
Extra Properties system allows you to set/get dynamic properties to entities those implement the `IHasExtraProperties` interface. It is especially useful when you want to add custom properties to the entities defined in an [application module](Modules/Index.md), when you use the module as package reference.
|
|
|
|
By default, all the extra properties of an entity are stored as a single `JSON` object in the database.
|
|
|
|
Entity extension system allows you to to store desired extra properties in separate fields in the related database table. For more information about the extra properties & the entity extension system, see the following documents:
|
|
|
|
* [Customizing the Application Modules: Extending Entities](Customizing-Application-Modules-Extending-Entities.md)
|
|
* [Entities](Entities.md)
|
|
|
|
This section only explains the EF Core related usage of the `ObjectExtensionManager`.
|
|
|
|
### ObjectExtensionManager.Instance
|
|
|
|
`ObjectExtensionManager` implements the singleton pattern, so you need to use the static `ObjectExtensionManager.Instance` to perform all the operations.
|
|
|
|
### MapEfCoreProperty
|
|
|
|
`MapEfCoreProperty` is a shortcut extension method to define an extension property for an entity and map to the database.
|
|
|
|
**Example**: Add `Title` property (database field) to the `IdentityRole` entity:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
ObjectExtensionManager.Instance
|
|
.MapEfCoreProperty<IdentityRole, string>(
|
|
"Title",
|
|
builder => { builder.HasMaxLength(64); }
|
|
);
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
If the related module has implemented this feature (by using the `ConfigureEfCoreEntity` explained below), then the new property is added to the model. Then you need to run the standard `Add-Migration` and `Update-Database` commands to update your database to add the new field.
|
|
|
|
>`MapEfCoreProperty` method must be called before using the related `DbContext`. It is a static method. The best way is to use it in your application as earlier as possible. The application startup template has a `YourProjectNameEntityExtensions` class that is safe to use this method inside.
|
|
|
|
### ConfigureEfCoreEntity
|
|
|
|
If you are building a reusable module and want to allow application developers to add properties to your entities, you can use the `ConfigureEfCoreEntity` extension method in your entity mapping. However, there is a shortcut extension method `ConfigureObjectExtensions` that can be used while configuring the entity mapping:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
builder.Entity<YourEntity>(b =>
|
|
{
|
|
b.ConfigureObjectExtensions();
|
|
//...
|
|
});
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
> If you call `ConfigureByConvention()` extension method (like `b.ConfigureByConvention()` for this example), ABP Framework internally calls the `ConfigureObjectExtensions` method. It is a **best practice** to use the `ConfigureByConvention()` method since it also configures database mapping for base properties by convention.
|
|
|
|
See the "*ConfigureByConvention Method*" section above for more information.
|
|
|
|
## Advanced Topics
|
|
|
|
### Set Default Repository Classes
|
|
|
|
Default generic repositories are implemented by `EfCoreRepository` class by default. You can create your own implementation and use it for all the default repository implementations.
|
|
|
|
First, define your default repository classes like that:
|
|
|
|
```csharp
|
|
public class MyRepositoryBase<TEntity>
|
|
: EfCoreRepository<BookStoreDbContext, TEntity>
|
|
where TEntity : class, IEntity
|
|
{
|
|
public MyRepositoryBase(IDbContextProvider<BookStoreDbContext> dbContextProvider)
|
|
: base(dbContextProvider)
|
|
{
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public class MyRepositoryBase<TEntity, TKey>
|
|
: EfCoreRepository<BookStoreDbContext, TEntity, TKey>
|
|
where TEntity : class, IEntity<TKey>
|
|
{
|
|
public MyRepositoryBase(IDbContextProvider<BookStoreDbContext> dbContextProvider)
|
|
: base(dbContextProvider)
|
|
{
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
First one is for [entities with composite keys](Entities.md), second one is for entities with single primary key.
|
|
|
|
It's suggested to inherit from the `EfCoreRepository` class and override methods if needed. Otherwise, you will have to implement all the standard repository methods manually.
|
|
|
|
Now, you can use `SetDefaultRepositoryClasses` option:
|
|
|
|
```csharp
|
|
context.Services.AddAbpDbContext<BookStoreDbContext>(options =>
|
|
{
|
|
options.SetDefaultRepositoryClasses(
|
|
typeof(MyRepositoryBase<,>),
|
|
typeof(MyRepositoryBase<>)
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
//...
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Set Base DbContext Class or Interface for Default Repositories
|
|
|
|
If your DbContext inherits from another DbContext or implements an interface, you can use that base class or interface as DbContext for default repositories. Example:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
public interface IBookStoreDbContext : IEfCoreDbContext
|
|
{
|
|
DbSet<Book> Books { get; }
|
|
}
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
`IBookStoreDbContext` is implemented by the `BookStoreDbContext` class. Then you can use generic overload of the `AddDefaultRepositories`:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
context.Services.AddAbpDbContext<BookStoreDbContext>(options =>
|
|
{
|
|
options.AddDefaultRepositories<IBookStoreDbContext>();
|
|
//...
|
|
});
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
Now, your custom `BookRepository` can also use the `IBookStoreDbContext` interface:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
public class BookRepository : EfCoreRepository<IBookStoreDbContext, Book, Guid>, IBookRepository
|
|
{
|
|
//...
|
|
}
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
One advantage of using an interface for a DbContext is then it will be replaceable by another implementation.
|
|
|
|
### Replace Other DbContextes
|
|
|
|
Once you properly define and use an interface for DbContext, then any other implementation can replace it using the `ReplaceDbContext` option:
|
|
|
|
````csharp
|
|
context.Services.AddAbpDbContext<OtherDbContext>(options =>
|
|
{
|
|
//...
|
|
options.ReplaceDbContext<IBookStoreDbContext>();
|
|
});
|
|
````
|
|
|
|
In this example, `OtherDbContext` implements `IBookStoreDbContext`. This feature allows you to have multiple DbContext (one per module) on development, but single DbContext (implements all interfaces of all DbContexts) on runtime.
|
|
|
|
## See Also
|
|
|
|
* [Entities](Entities.md) |