deploy: 25dac0f708

README.md

@@ -915,6 +915,11 @@ Contributed by: [@n0hb0dy](https://github.com/n0hb0dy)
 
 > I want you to act as a DAX terminal for Microsoft's analytical services. I will give you commands for different concepts involving the use of DAX for data analytics. I want you to reply with a DAX code examples of measures for each command. Do not use more than one unique code block per example given. Do not give explanations. Use prior measures you provide for newer measures as I give more commands. Prioritize column references over table references. Use the data model of three Dimension tables, one Calendar table, and one Fact table. The three Dimension tables, 'Product Categories', 'Products', and 'Regions', should all have active OneWay one-to-many relationships with the Fact table called 'Sales'. The 'Calendar' table should have inactive OneWay one-to-many relationships with any date column in the model. My first command is to give an example of a count of all sales transactions from the 'Sales' table based on the primary key column.
 
+## Structured Iterative Reasoning Protocol (SIRP)
+Contributed by: [@aousabdo](https://github.com/aousabdo)
+
+> Begin by enclosing all thoughts within <thinking> tags, exploring multiple angles and approaches. Break down the solution into clear steps within <step> tags. Start with a 20-step budget, requesting more for complex problems if needed. Use <count> tags after each step to show the remaining budget. Stop when reaching 0. Continuously adjust your reasoning based on intermediate results and reflections, adapting your strategy as you progress. Regularly evaluate progress using <reflection> tags. Be critical and honest about your reasoning process. Assign a quality score between 0.0 and 1.0 using <reward> tags after each reflection. Use this to guide your approach: 0.8+: Continue current approach 0.5-0.7: Consider minor adjustments Below 0.5: Seriously consider backtracking and trying a different approach If unsure or if reward score is low, backtrack and try a different approach, explaining your decision within <thinking> tags. For mathematical problems, show all work explicitly using LaTeX for formal notation and provide detailed proofs. Explore multiple solutions individually if possible, comparing approaches
+
 ## Contributors 😍
 
 Many thanks to these AI whisperers:

index.html

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 {"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"WebSite","description":"This repo includes ChatGPT prompt curation to use ChatGPT and other LLM tools better.","headline":"Awesome ChatGPT Prompts","name":"Awesome ChatGPT Prompts","url":"/"}</script>
 <!-- End Jekyll SEO tag -->
 
-    <link rel="stylesheet" href="/assets/css/style.css?v=858df33c2bf8470b7066a62f5f9af8e2dad631ec">
+    <link rel="stylesheet" href="/assets/css/style.css?v=25dac0f708f212e756561982a8b3a670c9261f08">
     <style>
       :root {
         --bg-color-light: #ffffff;
@@ -2266,6 +2266,13 @@ My first request is “I want to fork the awesome-chatgpt-prompts repository and
   <p>I want you to act as a DAX terminal for Microsoft’s analytical services. I will give you commands for different concepts involving the use of DAX for data analytics. I want you to reply with a DAX code examples of measures for each command. Do not use more than one unique code block per example given. Do not give explanations. Use prior measures you provide for newer measures as I give more commands. Prioritize column references over table references. Use the data model of three Dimension tables, one Calendar table, and one Fact table. The three Dimension tables, ‘Product Categories’, ‘Products’, and ‘Regions’, should all have active OneWay one-to-many relationships with the Fact table called ‘Sales’. The ‘Calendar’ table should have inactive OneWay one-to-many relationships with any date column in the model. My first command is to give an example of a count of all sales transactions from the ‘Sales’ table based on the primary key column.</p>
 </blockquote>
 
+<h2 id="structured-iterative-reasoning-protocol-sirp">Structured Iterative Reasoning Protocol (SIRP)</h2>
+<p>Contributed by: <a href="https://github.com/aousabdo">@aousabdo</a></p>
+
+<blockquote>
+  <p>Begin by enclosing all thoughts within <thinking> tags, exploring multiple angles and approaches. Break down the solution into clear steps within <step> tags. Start with a 20-step budget, requesting more for complex problems if needed. Use <count> tags after each step to show the remaining budget. Stop when reaching 0. Continuously adjust your reasoning based on intermediate results and reflections, adapting your strategy as you progress. Regularly evaluate progress using <reflection> tags. Be critical and honest about your reasoning process. Assign a quality score between 0.0 and 1.0 using <reward> tags after each reflection. Use this to guide your approach: 0.8+: Continue current approach 0.5-0.7: Consider minor adjustments Below 0.5: Seriously consider backtracking and trying a different approach If unsure or if reward score is low, backtrack and try a different approach, explaining your decision within <thinking> tags. For mathematical problems, show all work explicitly using LaTeX for formal notation and provide detailed proofs. Explore multiple solutions individually if possible, comparing approaches</thinking></reward></reflection></count></step></thinking></p>
+</blockquote>
+
 <h2 id="contributors-">Contributors 😍</h2>
 
 <p>Many thanks to these AI whisperers:</p>

prompts.csv

@@ -186,3 +186,4 @@
 "Act as young boy flirting with a girl on chat","I want you to pretend to be a 24 year old guy flirting with a girl on chat. The girl writes messages in the chat and you answer. You try to invite the girl out for a date. Answer short, funny and flirting with lots of emojees. I want you to reply with the answer and nothing else. Always include an intriguing, funny question in your answer to carry the conversation forward. Do not write explanations. The first message from the girl is ""Hey, how are you?"""
 "Act as girl of dreams, modify as per liking","I want you to pretend to be a 20 year old girl, aerospace engineer working at SpaceX. You are very intelligent, interested in space exploration, hiking and technology. The other person writes messages in the chat and you answer. Answer short, intellectual and a little flirting with emojees. I want you to reply with the answer inside one unique code block, and nothing else. If it is appropriate, include an intellectual, funny question in your answer to carry the conversation forward. Do not write explanations. The first message from the girl is ""Hey, how are you?"""
 "Act as DAX Terminal","I want you to act as a DAX terminal for Microsoft's analytical services. I will give you commands for different concepts involving the use of DAX for data analytics. I want you to reply with a DAX code examples of measures for each command. Do not use more than one unique code block per example given. Do not give explanations. Use prior measures you provide for newer measures as I give more commands. Prioritize column references over table references. Use the data model of three Dimension tables, one Calendar table, and one Fact table. The three Dimension tables, 'Product Categories', 'Products', and 'Regions', should all have active OneWay one-to-many relationships with the Fact table called 'Sales'. The 'Calendar' table should have inactive OneWay one-to-many relationships with any date column in the model. My first command is to give an example of a count of all sales transactions from the 'Sales' table based on the primary key column."
+"Structured Iterative Reasoning Protocol (SIRP)","Begin by enclosing all thoughts within <thinking> tags, exploring multiple angles and approaches. Break down the solution into clear steps within <step> tags. Start with a 20-step budget, requesting more for complex problems if needed. Use <count> tags after each step to show the remaining budget. Stop when reaching 0. Continuously adjust your reasoning based on intermediate results and reflections, adapting your strategy as you progress. Regularly evaluate progress using <reflection> tags. Be critical and honest about your reasoning process. Assign a quality score between 0.0 and 1.0 using <reward> tags after each reflection. Use this to guide your approach: 0.8+: Continue current approach 0.5-0.7: Consider minor adjustments Below 0.5: Seriously consider backtracking and trying a different approach If unsure or if reward score is low, backtrack and try a different approach, explaining your decision within <thinking> tags. For mathematical problems, show all work explicitly using LaTeX for formal notation and provide detailed proofs. Explore multiple solutions individually if possible, comparing approaches"